8.Thinking of cutting classes?It may come with a high price.In the Newberg School District,parents will get a 225fine for their kids'cutting school after letters,phone calls,and parent-teacher conferences don't work.
School officials hope the policy will improve attendance and encourage parents to do a better job of keeping track of their children."In today's world,if you don't go to school,you'll have a hard time getting ahead in life,"Noosha Razavian,a teacher from Newberg High School says."Fining parents if their child cuts school will make sure that today's kids don't end up on a street corner.Not only does this rule keep teens'futures bright,but it also keeps parents responsible for their children."
No parent wants to pay a 225fine.Lori Oberstadt,a mother of two from St.Paul,Minn.,says,"Paying the fine would change my kids'attitudes.There would be consequences for my children if I were to pay that fine,like no Facebook or cell phone."
But others argue that parents shouldn't be held responsible for their children's bad behavior."Parents cannot always watch their children.Many parents have to work or take care of younger children.In the end,students,not their parents,need to be held responsible for their actions,"Cole Boettcher,a father in Newberg says.
In some cases,the school may be partly responsible for the students'absences.If school were more interesting,maybe students would enjoy learning more and want to stay in school."As a taxpayer for public schools,parents expect that the educational programs are interesting enough that the students do not feel bored,"says Abby Saadat,the assistant of Encinitas Union School District in Encinitas,Calif.
63.The policy aims toB.
A.fine irresponsible parents
B.encourage students to attend school
C.prevent students going to school late
D.help students get a good job in the future
64.What may Noosha Razavian agree with?C
A.Kids with good class attendance will have a bright future.
B.Uneducated kids will live on the streets some day.
C.School plays an important part in kids'life.
D.Schools and parents should work together.
65.Who support the policy?A
A.Lori Oberstadt & Noosha Razavian.
B.Abby Saadat & Cole Boettcher.
C.Noosha Razavian & Abby Saadat.
D.Lori Oberstadt & Cole Boettcher.
66.In Cole Boettcher's opinion,who will be responsible for class-cutting?A
A.Students.B.Teachers.
C.Parents and schools.D.Students and parents.
分析 本文屬于說明文閱讀,作者通過這篇文章主要向我們描述了學(xué)校制定了一些政策用來鼓勵學(xué)生上學(xué),社會對此看法不一,有人支持也有人認(rèn)為孩子應(yīng)該學(xué)會對自己負(fù)責(zé).
解答 63.B.細(xì)節(jié)理解題.根據(jù)第二段:School officials hope the policy will improve attendance and encourage parents to do a better job of keeping track of their children可知政策旨在鼓勵學(xué)生上學(xué);故選B.
64.C.推理判斷題.根據(jù)第二段:Fining parents if their child cuts school will make sure that today's kids don't end up on a street corner可知Noosha Razavian會同意學(xué)校的一個重要組成部分是孩子的生活;故選C.
65.A.細(xì)節(jié)理解題.根據(jù)第二段第三段:Lori Oberstadt,a mother of two from St.Paul,Minn.,says,"Paying the fine would change my kids'attitudes可知Lori Oberstadt & Noosha Razavian支持這個政策;故選A.
66.A.細(xì)節(jié)理解題.根據(jù)第四段:Many parents have to work or take care of younger children.In the end,students,not their parents,need to be held responsible for their actions可知Cole Boettcher認(rèn)為學(xué)生,不是他們的父母,需要為自己的行為負(fù)責(zé);故選A.
點(diǎn)評 考察學(xué)生的細(xì)節(jié)理解和推理判斷能力,做細(xì)節(jié)理解題時一定要找到文章中的原句,和題干進(jìn)行比較,再做出正確的選擇.在做推理判斷題不要以個人的主觀想象代替文章的事實(shí),要根據(jù)文章事實(shí)進(jìn)行合乎邏輯的推理判斷.