分析 本文主要寫了一個(gè)有75年歷史的一個(gè)小劇院被拆除前,老板和觀眾的不舍之情,用看電影的方式來電影院告別.
解答 24.B 推理判斷題.根據(jù)第一段最后一句 another group began removing seats and other theater equipment in preparation for the building's end.另一組開始拆除座位和其他劇院設(shè)備以準(zhǔn)備大樓的結(jié)束.可以推斷出這是這是劇院結(jié)束的信號(hào),所以答案選B.
25.D 細(xì)節(jié)理解題.根據(jù)句子 Theater owner Ed Bradford said he chose the movie because it seemed appropriate 老板說他選擇這部電影是因?yàn)樗坪鹾线m.從下文也可以看出這部電影的背景就是一個(gè)劇院準(zhǔn)備拆除,所以答案選D.
26.C.推理判斷題.根據(jù)句子"This used to be the center of town,"he said."Now the area is mostly office buildings and warehouses."他說:"這里曾經(jīng)是市中心,現(xiàn)在主要是辦公樓和倉(cāng)庫(kù)."Bradford sold the building and land to a local development firm,which plans to build a shopping complex on the land where the theater is located可知該公司計(jì)劃在劇院所在地建立一個(gè)購(gòu)物中心.可以推斷出原來的這個(gè)劇院需要拆除推倒,所以答案選C.
27.B 推理判斷題.Though the movie is 30 years old,most of the 250 seats were filled with teary-eyed audience wanting to say good-bye to the old building.雖然這部電影有30多年了,250多個(gè)席位都被坐滿,含著流淚的觀眾想說對(duì)這個(gè)老建筑說再見.由此可以推斷出觀眾們的心情是沉重的,所以答案選B.
點(diǎn)評(píng) 本閱讀理解題主要測(cè)試考生在閱讀基礎(chǔ)上的邏輯推理能力,要求考生根據(jù)文章所述事件的邏輯關(guān)系,對(duì)未說明的趨勢(shì)或結(jié)局作出合理的推斷;或根據(jù)作者所闡述的觀點(diǎn)理論,對(duì)文章未涉及的現(xiàn)象、事例給以解釋.考生首先要仔細(xì)閱讀短文,完整了解信息,準(zhǔn)確把握作者觀點(diǎn).
年級(jí) | 高中課程 | 年級(jí) | 初中課程 |
高一 | 高一免費(fèi)課程推薦! | 初一 | 初一免費(fèi)課程推薦! |
高二 | 高二免費(fèi)課程推薦! | 初二 | 初二免費(fèi)課程推薦! |
高三 | 高三免費(fèi)課程推薦! | 初三 | 初三免費(fèi)課程推薦! |
科目:高中英語(yǔ) 來源: 題型:填空題
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語(yǔ) 來源: 題型:閱讀理解
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語(yǔ) 來源: 題型:填空題
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語(yǔ) 來源: 題型:聽力題
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語(yǔ) 來源: 題型:填空題
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語(yǔ) 來源:華大新高考聯(lián)盟2017屆高三5月教學(xué)質(zhì)量測(cè)評(píng)英語(yǔ)試卷 題型:閱讀理解
“It’s a big hammer to crack a nut.” This is how one angry parent described the recent crackdown(強(qiáng)制措施)by London police on parents who drop their kids off at school by car. Yes, you read that correctly—the very mode of transportation that many American schools insist—the only safe way to deliver kids to school is now being criminalized in the United Kingdom.
The decision to fine any vehicles seen dropping off or picking up kids with in a particular zone of east London comes from city councillors’(議員) long-term efforts to make the area safer and less crowded. They say they’ve been trying for years “to encourage sensible driving and parking”, but in vain. Neighborhood residents complain frequently about their driveways being blocked by illegally parked cars for 15 minutes or more,often while they’re trying to get to work, and the streets are long overcrowded.
Now the rules have changed. Some parents are angry. Angie Baillieul is a mother who made the “big hammer” comment and says the crackdown is “way over the top.” The nearest drop-off point for her six- year-old is now a five-minute walk from the school. Others are happy with the decision, severe though it may seem. Councillor Jason Frost said :
“Traffic has significantly reduced,and more children are now walking to school, which is a great outcome. I would rather have complaints that we are slightly inconveniencing parents than hear that a child had been seriously injured because nothing was done.”
I witness daily the chaos created by these in-town drivers,when I walk my own kids to school. There’s a parking lot overflowing with vehicles and a slow-moving train of cars moving in circles,many filling the air with harmful smokes. Meanwhile, the conversations around child over-weight and the importance of daily physical activity continue to stand out in schools.
1.Why is Angie Baillieul opposed to the new rule?
A. She is often fined by London police. B. She will lose her job as a school driver.
C. She has adapted to the American practice. D. She thinks it adds inconvenience to her son.
2.Why has the new rule been made according to Jason Frost1?
A. On account of massive complaints. B. Because of heavy traffic jams.
C. Owing to safety concern. D. Due to air pollution.
3.What can be seen after the crackdown is carried out?
A. Less daily chaos. B. Favor from all people.
C. More over-weight children. D. Complaints from neighbors.
4.What is the main idea of the text?
A. Parents attempt to resist a school rule.
B. London police cause widespread anger.
C. American schools care about kids7 safety.
D. Different voices are heard on a new traffic policy.
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語(yǔ) 來源: 題型:填空題
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語(yǔ) 來源:重慶市2016-2017學(xué)年高二3月月考英語(yǔ)試卷 題型:短文改錯(cuò)
假定英語(yǔ)課上老師要求同桌之間交換修改作文,請(qǐng)你修改你同桌寫的以下作文.文中共有10 處語(yǔ)言錯(cuò)誤,每句中最多有兩處。每處錯(cuò)誤僅涉及一個(gè)單詞的增加、刪除或修改
增加:在缺詞處加一個(gè)漏字符號(hào)(∧),并在其下面寫出該加的詞。
刪除:把多余的詞用斜線(\)劃掉。
修改:在錯(cuò)的詞下劃?rùn)M線,并在該詞下面寫出修改后的詞。
注意:1.每處錯(cuò)誤及其修改均僅限一詞:
2.只允許修改10處,多者(從第11處起)不計(jì)分。
Dear friends,
May I have you attention, please? I'm going to talk about something focusing in Protecting Wildlife. So far millions of species have died off or, have endangered mainly for two reasons. For one thing, man has been killing them for food or other commercial reasons. Take antelopes for example. Poachers hunt them for their fur, that can be made into luxurious shawls. For another, human civilization has been developing very fast that man has invaded and destroyed wild animals' natural habitats. Human activity have greatly threatened their existence. If all the wild animals disappear one day from the planet, humans would feel lonely. The world is beautiful for its diversity. Besides, some animals are extreme useful in the field of science, while others are especially adorable, unique, and keep us a good company. However, we should learn to share the earth with them. Thank you for your time.
查看答案和解析>>
百度致信 - 練習(xí)冊(cè)列表 - 試題列表
湖北省互聯(lián)網(wǎng)違法和不良信息舉報(bào)平臺(tái) | 網(wǎng)上有害信息舉報(bào)專區(qū) | 電信詐騙舉報(bào)專區(qū) | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報(bào)專區(qū) | 涉企侵權(quán)舉報(bào)專區(qū)
違法和不良信息舉報(bào)電話:027-86699610 舉報(bào)郵箱:58377363@163.com