Question

11．I'm not an animal lover．Cats make me sneeze．When our daughter left home it never occurred to me to fill the empty home with a dog．But with Turkey now considering a law that would gather Istanbul's about 150，000 homeless cats and dogs，I may well change my mind．
It wouldn't be possible to live in a neighborhood here and be against all animals．Hairy dogs walk down our main street，and my garden is home to lots of wild cats．The animals are wild in the sense that they don't belong to any single person．
These animals lead a good life．Self-appointed protectors put out food and water all year around．The doctor's wife is forever nursing a sick cat．"live and let live"is the motto．The dogs bark at night defending their area，and if we tried to get rid of them，we'd only get a pack of unfamiliar ones in their place．
Senpolat，one of my neighbors，is the head of the Animal Rights Federation．He angrily complains about the illegal pet trade，the badly---run zoos and the failure to criminalize animal cruelty．
This summer the government suggested taking homeless animals off the streets and put them in"wild life parks"．"Death camps"is how Senpolat described those，imagining a real dog-eat-dog world．The scheme reminds people of the great animal disaster of 1910，when a new，modern government forced thousands of dogs to live at a small island off Istanbul．The wind would carry the frightening howls（嚎叫） of the starving animals back to the city．
Other voices rose last Sunday when thousands of people in cities across the country walked through the streets to protest against the new law．First thing Monday morning，the government cancelled the law．Civil protest is not unusual in Turkey，but it's unusual for the government to listen．
66．What lead to the author's changing her mind about animals？B
A．Her daughter   B．The new considering law in Turkey  
C．Her neighbor   D．Her family
67．According to the text，the writer thought thatC．
A．most people enjoyed the barks of dogs at night
B．it was good to put homeless animals in wild life parks
C．it is normal that homeless animals live in the neighbor
D．the government always tended to listen to civil protest
68．Why did Senpolat describe"wild life parks"as"Death camps"？B
A．Because it was illegal to trade I animals．
B．Because homeless animals would starve to death．
C．Because animals can't adapt to the new environment．
D．Because animals can't live at peace with each other．
69．What did the author feel when the government cancelled the new law？D
A．Thrilled．B．Sad．C．Concerned．D．Unexpected．
70．What might be the most suitable title for the passage？A
A．Live and Let Live            B．Bad Living Conditions of Animals
C．Leave Dogs and Cats There    D．Limit the Activity of Animals．

Answer 1

分析 本文主要講述政府對(duì)無家可歸動(dòng)物實(shí)施了一項(xiàng)新的法律，但最后取消了，引起極大的反感．

解答 BCBDA
66  B  細(xì)節(jié)題． 根據(jù)文章第一 段with Turkey now considering a law that would gather Istanbul's about 150，000 homeless cats and dogs，I may well change my mind可知改變作者想法的是The new considering law in Turkey  故選B．
67  C  細(xì)節(jié)題． 根據(jù)文章第二 段It wouldn't be possible to live in a neighborhood here and be against all animals． 可知住在這里不可能反對(duì)所有動(dòng)物，故選C．
68  B  細(xì)節(jié)題． 根據(jù)文章第五 段The wind would carry the frightening howls（嚎叫） of the starving animals back to the city．可知無家可歸的動(dòng)物會(huì)餓死，故選B．
69  D  細(xì)節(jié)題． 根據(jù)文章最后一段 Civil protest is not unusual in Turkey，but it's unusual for the government to listen．可知作者沒有預(yù)料到政府會(huì)取消這個(gè)法律，故選D．
70  A   主旨大意題．  通讀全文可知本文主要講述政府對(duì)無家可歸動(dòng)物實(shí)施了一項(xiàng)新的法律，但最后取消了，引起極大的反感．故選A．

點(diǎn)評(píng) 做閱讀理解時(shí)要快速的瀏覽全文，把握文章主旨大意，帶著問題回到原文，尋找細(xì)節(jié)或概括相應(yīng)的答案，最后要理清作者寫作思路．