The a 【小題1】 of scientists towards the rise is completely different. On the one hand, Dr Foster thinks that the trend which increases the temperature by 5 degrees would be a 【小題2】 (大災難). On the other hand, George Hambley, who is o 【小題3】 to this view, predicts that any warming will be 【小題4】 (溫和的) with few bad environmental c 【小題5】 .
科目:高中英語 來源:2012-2013學年河北省棗強縣中學高一上學期期末考試英語試卷(帶解析) 題型:完型填空
完形填空(共20小題;每小題1.5分,滿分30分)
In the past, man didn’t have to think about the protection of his environment. There were few people on the earth, and natural resources seemed to be 1 .
Today things are 2 , and the world has become too 3 . We’re using up our natural resources too quickly, and at the same time we are 4 our environment with dangerous chemicals. If we continue to do this, human life on the earth 5 survive.
Everyone 6 today that if too many fish are taken from the sea, there will soon be none left. Yet, with modern fishing 7, more and more fish are caught. We know that if too many trees are cut down, 8 will disappear and nothing will grow on the land. Yet, we 9 to use bigger and more powerful machines to 10 more and more trees.
We know that if rivers are polluted with waste products from factories, we’ll die. 11 , in most countries wastes are 12 put into rivers or into the sea, and there are 13 laws to stop this.
We know, too, that if the 14 of the world continues to rise at the present rate, in a few years there will not be enough 15 . What can we do to solve these problems?
If we eat more vegetables and less 16 there will be more food available for every one. Land that is used to grow crops 17 five times more people than land where animals are kept.
Our natural resources will 18 longer if we learn to recycle them.
The world population will not rise so quickly if people use modern methods of birth 19 .
Finally, if we educate people to think about the problems, we shall have a better and cleaner 20 in the future.
【小題1】 |
|
【小題2】 |
|
【小題3】 |
|
【小題4】 |
|
【小題5】 |
|
【小題6】 |
|
【小題7】 |
|
【小題8】 |
|
【小題9】 |
|
【小題10】 |
|
【小題11】 |
|
【小題12】 |
|
【小題13】 |
|
【小題14】 |
|
【小題15】 |
|
【小題16】 |
|
【小題17】 |
|
【小題18】 |
|
【小題19】 |
|
【小題20】 |
|
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源:2010年江蘇灌云高級中學高一下學期期末考試英語卷 題型:閱讀理解
Millions of youngsters across Europe could suffer permanent hearing loss after five years if they listen to MP3 players at too high a volume for more than five hours a week, EU scientists warned.
The scientists’ study, requested by the European Commission, attacked the concept of “l(fā)eisure noise,” saying children and teenagers should be protected from increasingly high sound levels---with loud mobile phones also coming in for criticism(批評).
“There has been increasing concern about exposure from the new generation of personal music players which can reproduce sounds at very high volumes without loss of quality,” the Commission, the EU’s executive arm, said in a statement.
“Risk for hearing damage depends on sound level and exposure time,” it said. More and more young people were exposed to the great threat(威脅)that leisure noise posed to hearing, it said.
Commission experts said that between 50 and 100 million people listen to portable music players on a daily basis.
If they listened for only five hours a week at more than 89 decibels(分貝), they would already be beyond EU limits for noise allowed in the workplace, they said. But if they listened for longer periods, they risked permanent hearing loss after five years.
The scientists calculated the number of people in that risk category at between five and 10 percent of listeners, meaning up to 10 million people in the European Union.
Sales of personal music players have soared in EU countries in recent years, particularly of MP3 players.
"I am worried that so many young people ... who are frequent users of personal music players and mobile phones at high acoustic levels, may be unknowingly damaging their hearing ," she said in the statement.
【小題1】Which of the following can be the best title of the article?
A.Youngsters across Europe: suffer permanent hearing loss. |
B.MP3 players: sell best but do harm to youngsters |
C.The scientists’ study: requested by the EU |
D.EU warns youth: turn your MP3 players down! |
A.textbook | B.medical report |
C.teen magazine | D.governmental newspaper |
A.were uncovered | B.felt | C.realized | D.were faced with |
A.besides the high sound levels, scientists also criticized loud mobile phones. |
B.if one listened for 5 hours more a week at 100 decibels, he would risk permanent hearing loss. |
C.it is only the level of the sound that can do damage to hearing. |
D.the scientists said there were 5-10 percent of MP3 listeners risking hearing loss around the world. |
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源:2011屆浙江省溫州中學高一上學期期中考試英語卷 題型:閱讀理解
This year 2,300 teenagers ( young people aged from 13-19 ) from all over the world will spend about ten months in U.S. homes. They will attend U.S. schools, meet U.S. teenagers, and form impressions (印象) of the real American teenagers. American teenagers will go to other countries to learn new languages and have a new understanding of the rest of the world.
Here is a two-way student exchange in action. Fred, nineteen, spent last year in Germany with George's family. In return, George's son, Mike, spent a year in Fred's home in America.
Fred, a lively young man, knew little German when he arrived, but after two months study, the language began to come to him. School was completely different from what he had expected — much harder. Students rose respectfully (尊敬地) when the teacher entered the room. They took fourteen subjects instead of the six that are usual in the United States. There were almost no outside activities.
Family life, too, was different. The family's word was law, and all activities were around the family rather than one of the members. Fred found the food too simple at first. Also, he missed having a car.
“Back home, you pick up some friends in a car and go out and have a good time. In Germany, you walk, but you soon learn to like it.”
At the same time, in America, Mike, a friendly German boy, was also forming his idea. “I suppose I should criticize (批評) American schools.” he says. “It is far too easy by our level. But I have to say that I like it very much. In Germany we do nothing but study. Here we take part in many outside activities. I think that maybe your schools are better in training for citizens. There ought to be some middle ground between the two.”
【小題1】The whole exchange program is mainly to ____.
A.help teenagers in other countries know the real America |
B.send students in America to travel in Germany |
C.let students learn something about other countries |
D.have teenagers learn new languages |
A.American food tasted better than German food. |
B.German schools were harder than American schools. |
C.Americans and Germans were both friendly. |
D.There were more cars on the streets in America. |
A.There is some middle ground between the two teaching buildings. |
B.There are a lot of after-school activities. |
C.Students usually take 14 subjects in all. |
D.Students go outside to enjoy themselves in a car. |
A.A better education should include something good from both America and Germany. |
B.German schools trained students to be better citizens. |
C.American schools were not as good as German schools. |
D.The easy life in the American school was more helpful to students. |
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源:2011年四川普通高等學校全國招生統(tǒng)一考試英語試卷 題型:閱讀理解
In business, there is a speed difference: It's the difference between how important a firms leaders say speed is to their competitive (競爭的) strategy(策略)and how fast the company actually moves. The difference is important regardless of industry and company size .Companies fearful of losing their competitive advantage spend much time and money looking for ways to pick up the speed.
In our study of 343 businesses, the companies that choose to go, go, go to try to gain an edge ended up with lower sales and operating incomes than those that paused at key moments to make sure they were on the right track, What’s more, the firms that “slowed down to speed up “improved their top and bottom lines, averaging 40% higher sales and 52% higher operating incomes over a three-year period.
How did they disobey the laws of business physics, taking more time than competitors yet performing better? They thought differently about what “slower” and “faster” mean. Firms sometimes fail to understand the difference between operation speed (moving quickly )and strategic speed (reducing the time it takes to deliver value ).Simply increasing the speed of production, for example ,may be one way to try to reduce the speed difference .But that often leads to reduced value over time, in the form of lower-quality products and services.
In our study, higher-performing companies with strategic speed always made changes when necessary. They became more open to ideas and discussion. They encouraged new ways of thinking. And they allowed time to look back and learn. By contrast (相比而言), performance suffered at firms that moved fast all the time, paid too much attention to improving efficiency, stuck to tested methods, didn’t develop team spirit among their employees, and had little time thinking about changes.
Strategic speed serves as a kind of leadership. Teams that regularly take time to get things right , rather than plough ahead full bore , are more successful in meeting their business goals . That kind of strategy must come from the top.
【小題1】 What does the underlined part “gain an edge ”in Paragraph 2 mean ?
A.Increase the speed. |
B.Get an advantage. |
C.Reach the limit. |
D.Set a goal. |
A.spending more time and performing worse. |
B.spending more time and performing better |
C.spending less time and performing worse |
D.spending less time and performing better |
A.how fast a firm moves depends on how big it is. |
B.how competitive a firm is depends on what it produces. |
C.Firms guided by strategic speed take time to make necessary changes. |
D.Firms guided by operational speed take time to develop necessary team spirit. |
A.Improve quality? Serve better. |
B.Deliver value? Plough ahead. |
C.Reduce time? Move faster. |
D.Need speed? Slow down. |
查看答案和解析>>
湖北省互聯(lián)網違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網上有害信息舉報專區(qū) | 電信詐騙舉報專區(qū) | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區(qū) | 涉企侵權舉報專區(qū)
違法和不良信息舉報電話:027-86699610 舉報郵箱:58377363@163.com