Question

Moral science is taught as a subject in most schools but with little effect. Perhaps part of the problem lies in the fact that morality is not a science, strictly speaking. It is too much of a social phenomenon, and also has too much of the personal and subjective things mixed within. Besides, morality itself changes with generations. So it is impossible to be defined in a textbook.

I remember sitting through forty minutes of moral lessons, which told stories about little children who never told lies and were rewarded for their goodness. It had little effect and left no impression on me, though.

If moral science has to be taught as a subject in schools, it needs a participatory (參與其中的 ) approach. When you tell a child about morals, you also have to deal with social norms(規(guī)范) and cultural differences. You have to explain that morality can be subjective, and be able to co-exist in society. You will probably have to refer to the morals of the present time.

The best way to tell a child how to live is to show him what is valued. If a child likes his friend, you have to make the child think about why. Once the child notices and recognizes goodness in others, he or she is likely to develop it as well.

In fact, children learn most of their morals by watching people around them. They absorb behavior patterns from teachers and older students. They watch to see what is rewarded and who is punished. They learn on the sports field and through social work. Moral science lessons should simply consist of letting them live and interact, and watch you support correct values and reward good behavior.

1.Which is NOT the reason that moral science is taught in schools but with little effect?

A. Morality doesn't strictly belong to a science.

B. Morality is more like a social phenomenon.

C. Morality can't be written down in textbooks.

D. Different generations have different moral ideas, '

2.The author describes his own experience of having moral lessons in order to .

A. explain telling lies not moral for little children

B. advise people should be rewarded for their goodness

C. show he has no opinions about moral science

D. prove moral lessons in schools have little effect

3.When you tell a child about morals, you should .

A. teach him to share personal moral ideas with others

B. tell him about social norms and cultural differences

C. explain that nobody can influence his moral ideas

D. say that the present morals are likely to be changed

4.What is the last paragraph mainly about?

A. The influence of people's behavior on morals.

B. The value of teachers' setting a good example.

C. The best way of teaching children about morals.

D. The importance of rewarding good behavior.

Answer 1

1.C

2.D

3.B

4.C

【解析】

試題分析：文章介紹了德育在學(xué)校的教育效果很差的原因及其德育課最好的方式是什么。

1.小題1】細(xì)節(jié)理解題：從第一段的內(nèi)容：可知德育在學(xué)校效果很差，是因?yàn)镻erhaps part of the problem lies in the fact that morality is not a science, strictly speaking. It is too much of a social phenomenon, and also has too much of the personal and subjective things mixed within. Besides, morality itself changes with generations. A：道德嚴(yán)格來(lái)說(shuō)不是一門科學(xué)，B道德更像社會(huì)問(wèn)題，D不同的一代有不同的道德。根據(jù)排除法可知選C。

2.小題2】細(xì)節(jié)理解題：從第二段的句子：It had little effect and left no impression on me, though.可知作者提到自己上的道德課，是為了證明道德課沒(méi)有多大作用而且對(duì)自己也沒(méi)有留下什么印象，選D。

3.小題3】細(xì)節(jié)理解題：從第三段的句子：When you tell a child about morals, you also have to deal with social norms（規(guī)范）and cultural differences. 可知給孩子講道德的時(shí)候，要告訴他們一些社會(huì)規(guī)范和文化差異。答案是B。

4.小題4】推理判斷題。根據(jù)文章最后一段的內(nèi)容，得知孩子學(xué)習(xí)道德主要是從父母，老師和大一點(diǎn)的同學(xué)那里學(xué)習(xí)，可知主要講教育孩子學(xué)習(xí)道德最好的方式，選C。

考點(diǎn)：教育類文章