Question

書面表達（滿分25分）

今年2月6日，教育部對“高中是否該取消文理分科”公開向社會征求意見。為此，某媒體做了一次民意調(diào)查，結(jié)果如圖表所示。

支持者（43 %）	反對者（50  %）	你的觀點
1、減輕課業(yè)負擔； 2、集中學習某種學科，成為專業(yè)人才。	1.人才培養(yǎng)需要廣泛領域的知識； 2.現(xiàn)代社會的發(fā)展需要復合型人才。	。。。 。。。

請你結(jié)合圖表，用英語寫一篇題為“Should Science and Arts Education Be Separated?”的短文，介紹調(diào)查情況并談一下你的看法

要求： 1.觀點明確，理由充分； 

2.不要逐句翻譯； 

3.字數(shù)100左右，開頭已給出，不計入總詞數(shù)

參考詞匯: 負擔－burden (n.&vt) 復合型人才－multi-skilled people                                                                                                  

The issue of separating science and arts education is getting heated up as debate spreads

across the country, which attracts tens of thousands of votes.

 

Answer 1

【答案】

參考范文：

Should Science and Arts Education Be Separated?

The issue of separating science and arts education is getting heated up as debate spreads across the country, which attracts tens of thousands of votes.

About 50% of the people interviewed think it unwise to get arts and science separated in high school. In their opinion, a real expert needs a wide range of knowledge. With the development of modern society, multi-skilled people are in great demand. However, another 43% of them insist that they should be separated so that students can concentrate on some subjects and become experts. Besides, they will not be overburdened as before. 

As far as I’m concerned, a comprehensive education is better than a separated one. A strong ability in both science and arts is helpful for the long-term development of individuals and the society as a whole. Worldwide, only in China science and arts are separated, which has had a bad effect on students’ sound development. It's high time we changed this model.

【解析】從所給的文字提示可以看出本文屬于議論文，一般而言，議論文分為三大段：正方、反方以及作者的觀點或看法。關鍵是應該注意語言的通順，緊湊；還有就是書寫的美觀。